The 40th anniversary of Hubert Humphrey's death on Jan. 13, 1978, finds fewer and fewer Minnesotans who remember a decent man who did great things as mayor of Minneapolis, as a U.S. senator and as vice president of the United States.
We were blessed to have worked for Humphrey in Washington and during his sadly unsuccessful campaign for president in 1968. He lost to Republican Richard Nixon by less than 1 percent of the vote. The Vietnam War that Humphrey had first opposed, then had begrudgingly supported, had torn the country apart and certainly contributed to his defeat.
It was the nation's loss as well. Humphrey had a vision of America, an achievable vision in which inequality, hate and ignorance were at least diminished, if not eliminated. He felt that the political process should lead us closer to that goal.
Now, 40 years after his death, our country is close to a national nervous breakdown. So we ask, "What would Hubert Humphrey have to say about our country's current political situation and, of more significance, what would Humphrey do if he were still in public office?"
In speech after speech, year after year, Humphrey would recall the opening words of the U.S. Constitution: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union … ."
In Humphrey's mind, these words captured the essence of American democracy. "We the people" decide. Not some hereditary monarch or unelected autocrat or well-heeled lobbyist but "We the people." While the reality often seemed otherwise, Humphrey never lost faith in this ideal. It would still motivate and direct his actions today.
He typically would then spell out how our union fell short of perfection, in area after area, but he'd always lay out his ideas for moving down the difficult path of making it better. What was his vision?
Humphrey's universe of caring was broad and deep, seemingly without boundaries. He got into just about everything there was to get into. He truly subscribed to, and frequently repeated, Franklin Roosevelt's doctrine that "the test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have little."