If one were to bravely declare that hard work and strong families are important ingredients in building prosperous communities, few would feel driven to disagree.
So it's surprising how seldom these basic building blocks of well-being are candidly discussed in Minnesota's earnest conversations about distressing economic disparities among this state's racial groups.
Well, OK — maybe it's not surprising. To probe group differences in work habits and family life is to risk seeming to disparage certain groups, blame them for their hardships and ignore the role of discrimination in perpetuating inequalities.
In fact, many social injustices, past and present, undermine family cohesion and inhibit employment. But whatever the causes, getting down to basics and seeing clearly what everyday realities are holding people back seems like it has to be part of any honest effort to help them move ahead.
A powerful new instrument for spotting realities has been provided this year by the Minnesota State Demographic Center. It's a "chartbook" boldly titled "The Economic Status of Minnesotans," and it bills itself as a "first-of-its-kind report."
The chartbook (http://tinyurl.com/zzzlhdq) lives up to those ambitions by dissecting census data and sorting Minnesotans into no less than 17 distinct cultural groups.
This statistical surgery illuminates the dramatically different circumstances of populations that often are confusingly lumped together in broad ethnic groups. For example, the chartbook distinguishes between "Asian" populations — those from India and China, say — that are among the most affluent communities in Minnesota and the rather more challenged Hmong population of southeast Asian refugees.
Importantly, the report also isolates an "African-American" population of nonimmigrant black Minnesotans. This helps eliminate uncertainties about whether the special challenges of recent African immigrants, such as those from Somalia, may be skewing the overall economic statistics for Minnesota's black community.