For all the heated rhetoric about the Affordable Care Act being a rigid, top-down approach to health care, the 2010 federal health reform law in reality gives states abundant opportunities to innovate, and often the additional funding needed to make it happen.
This fall, Minnesota will launch its homegrown version of the online health insurance marketplaces called for by the landmark law. While passage of the legislation authorizing the state-built exchange dominated headlines this session, lawmakers and Gov. Mark Dayton's administration weren't done when it came to custom-fitting the ACA for Minnesota.
The result of their ongoing hard work this year is a lesser-known but even more pioneering and compassionate Minnesota twist on federal health reform: a next-generation MinnesotaCare program that will roll out in January and begin to take advantage of newly available federal dollars to better cover the working poor.
Launched in 1992, MinnesotaCare is one of the state's signature health reforms, providing subsidized medical coverage to those who make too much to qualify for traditional medical assistance but who struggle to buy quality insurance on their own — often the working poor.
MinnesotaCare had an average of 129,000 monthly enrollees in 2012. It is funded by a state tax on medical providers (48 percent in 2012), federal medical assistance match dollars (44 percent) and sliding-scale premiums paid by enrollees (8 percent).
The program is one of the key reasons that Minnesota has a low uninsured rate. MinnesotaCare has long had bipartisan support because it improves access to preventive care and gets people covered before a medical crisis strikes, helping hold down uncompensated care costs, some of which are passed along to the privately insured.
Twenty-two years after MinnesotaCare's creation, the ACA will attempt to accomplish the same goal of helping the working poor get affordable care coverage. Next year, the health reform law will make tax credits available to help those who don't qualify for expanded medical assistance and whose incomes fall within certain guidelines.
Most states do not have a program like MinnesotaCare, so this will be a major step forward. But in Minnesota, it could have been a step backward. Letters signed earlier this year by many Democratic and Republican members of the state's congressional delegation and its legislative leadership warn federal health officials that a wholesale switch to the exchange would push many MinnesotaCare enrollees into less affordable high-deductible, high-copay plans.