On April 24, a Top News blurb on the front page of the Star Tribune caught my eye: "Variety: Gender bias and leadership: Without realizing it, most people associate 'leader' with men." And indeed, there was the article — atop a review of the Children's Theatre Company play "The Lorax," and one of three articles on the Variety cover that day.
I was immediately annoyed. First, the fact that this topic shows up in the Variety section and not Business tells me that the issue is interesting, but not serious. And second, while the content of the article itself is commendable, it adds to a fundamental problem with the discourse about women and leadership: all talk, minimal action.
Here's the gist of the article: The story covered a journal study that asked people to draw a picture of a leader. Men drew men, women drew men — even those who drew genderless leaders usually spoke in male terms about their figures. Later on, the article "revealed" that it's "taking charge" that is the real characteristic of a leader — yet even when reading the same "take charge" script to a group, the male readers were more likely to be perceived as leaders. Not the female ones. The article ends with the statement: "How can this problem be overcome? One reliable way to help people to see more women as leader-like is to expose them to more women in actual leadership positions."
This can't be new to anyone, given the times we live in, the stories brought forward via #MeToo, and the hundreds of books, business articles and programs on women and leadership. Are people really just figuring this out now? Please say it isn't so.
Maybe highlighting some current statistics will help: The percentage of women in Congress? Nineteen percent. The percentage of women running Fortune 500 companies? Five percent. The number of female CEOs in Minnesota's 100 largest publicly traded companies? Six. The percentage of women in the Minnesota Legislature? Thirty-two percent. Have these numbers risen over time? Yes. But have we stalled? Yes. Those same percentages have increased by very small margins since 1996 and projections for future growth are grim.
Having worked on economic issues for women and girls for nearly my entire career in a variety of capacities, I am going to weigh in with my own advice:
1) Stop looking for proof from scholarly journal articles and other sources to demonstrate what has been true for much longer than the 25 years I have been in this field: As a society, when it comes down to it, we question women and their ability to lead.
2) Determine action you can take that does not include telling women to ask for more, be more bold, stand up, blah blah blah. Instead, carefully examine your role. Where do you have opportunities to propel women into leadership? Where do you have opportunities to examine the policies, programs, and structures in your workplaces and communities that will result in more women leading?