Minnesota law enforcement agencies have historically refused to disclose video footage of officer-involved shootings early in a case, repeating a similar refrain: Doing so could taint the investigation into whether officers acted legally in killing someone.
But that may be slowly changing as scrutiny here and across the country forces authorities to modify long-held practices.
St. Paul police are debating whether to divulge footage to the public before a grand jury convenes, and three officers vying to become the next chief say they're open to the idea. Whoever gets the job will likely be affected.
In Minneapolis, Police Chief Janeé Harteau recently said she'll consider disclosing videos in the future if they won't compromise an investigation. Her department's fatal shooting of Jamar Clark last November led to major protests and demands for footage from that night.
"People tend to create a narrative they want to create, and the sooner we can release the videos along with the facts, the better," said Harteau, who spoke generally and not about the Clark case because it remains under investigation.
Authorities need to take that bold step to maintain the community's trust, said former Minneapolis Police Chief Tim Dolan, who, during his tenure, released three videos before investigations were complete.
"If you have a city that's starting to burn down and you have something you can show them, get it out," Dolan said. "I think that's part of public service."
Why others haven't follow Dolan's example in the face of speculation and public unrest is unclear. At stake, law enforcement officials say, is the delicate balance between keeping the public informed and conducting a fair, thorough investigation.