Allina Health nurses at five Twin Cities hospitals voted on Thursday to authorize a second strike — this time until a contract is reached — in a dispute over health benefits, staffing and workplace safety.
While nurses at three voting locations said they will need to find second jobs and cut expenses to counter the loss of pay from Allina during a strike, they also said they believe it was necessary to defend their benefits and press the health system after an initial one-week strike in June didn't result in a deal.
"Otherwise it was all for naught if we went on strike the first time and we didn't get anything," said Becky Auger, a nurse at United Hospital in St. Paul.
Leaders of the Minnesota Nurses Association, the union representing roughly 4,800 Allina nurses, will meet soon to decide when to issue a required 10-day notice before a strike can take place.
A key sticking point has been health insurance; Allina wanted to eliminate four union-backed plans and move the nurses to its corporate plans at a savings of $10 million per year. The savings were predicted in part because the union plans have high premiums but low or no deductibles — giving nurses no financial incentives to make prudent health care expenditures such as using urgent-care clinics rather than more costly emergency rooms.
While Allina executives were braced for a no vote, they were disappointed when talks broke down. Dr. Penny Wheeler, Allina's chief executive, said Wednesday that Allina made a major compromise to discontinue only two of the union plans, though nurses would have to bear most of the cost increases to keep the remaining plans afloat.
"We know that our nurses would be heartbroken to leave the side of their patients," she said. "And for what reason? … It's hard to believe they would strike over this when actually they have another choice."
The June strike cost Allina $20.4 million.