It was a year and a half ago when President Obama told Diane Sawyer of ABC News that he would rather be a good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president. Now, coming off one of his worst weeks since taking office, Obama is nearing a decision on whether he really meant that. Is he willing to try to administer the disagreeable medicine that could help the economy mend over the long term, even if that means damaging his chances for re-election?The Federal Reserve's finding Tuesday that there is little prospect for rapid economic growth over the next two years was the latest in a summer of bad economic news. One administration official called the atmosphere around the president's economic team "angry and morose."
There was no word on the mood of the president's political team, but it was unlikely to be buoyed by the Fed's assertion that the economy would still be faltering well past the next inauguration.
"The problem for Obama is that right now, the United States is either at a precipice or has fallen off it," said David Rothkopf, a Commerce Department official in the Clinton administration. "If he is true to his commitment to rather be a good one-term president, then this is the character test. In some respects, this is the 3 a.m. phone call."
'Two big problems'
Obama, Rothkopf argues, has to focus in the next 18 months on getting the economy back on track for the long haul, even if that means pushing for politically unpalatable budget cuts, including real -- but hugely unpopular -- reductions in Social Security, other entitlement programs and the military.
A longtime Republican strategist echoed Rothkopf. Charlie Black, a senior adviser to Sen. John McCain when he ran for president, said Obama "has got two big problems" -- the unemployment rate and the budget deficit. "Frankly, there's not a whole lot he can do about jobs now," Black said. "But it would help if we got the deficit under control, and to do that, you've got to reform entitlements."
For instance, he argued, Obama should tackle Social Security, leaving the system in place for those 55 and older but establishing means tests to determine benefits for those younger than 55. If Obama did that, Black said, "He could be a hero like Bill Clinton was when he negotiated with Trent Lott and Newt Gingrich" on the 1997 budget.
If Black's take is correct and there is little the president can do about jobs, that is more bad news. In a New York Times/CBS News poll released last week, 62 percent of those responding said that creating jobs was the No. 1 priority, while only 29 percent said cutting the deficit should be the top goal.