After years of trying, Major League Soccer's roster development efforts are finally beginning to pay off. Most of the league's teams are bringing multiple "homegrown" players through their youth academies, and the league has seen an influx of young talent from Central and South America. Teams have never been more focused on developing young players.
Meanwhile, American college soccer appears to be in the process of being left behind, thanks in part to the collegiate system's anachronistic structure.
American fans are used to the NCAA being the breeding ground for all young talent. It's true in football and basketball, and even baseball and hockey have thriving collegiate systems that are the starting point for plenty of big-leaguers. In MLS, though, the NCAA is more of an afterthought.
Of Minnesota United's four picks in the 2017 MLS SuperDraft, which exists mostly for NCAA players, only No. 1 overall selection Abu Danladi remains with the team. This year, Real Salt Lake had three selections in the third and fourth rounds and didn't even bother to pick players. Can you imagine the uproar if an NFL team passed on a third-round draft pick?
In many ways, college soccer isn't set up to develop players for professional soccer. The college soccer season is an autumn-only sprint, with teams playing two or three games every week, often only two days apart. The helter-skelter season ends up finishing with playoffs in November and December, when the weather in much of the country is inhospitable for soccer.
Perhaps more important, college soccer allows virtually unlimited substitutions, including allowing players to re-enter the game after leaving. This tends to make the games far more physical and far less skill-based, as players come on for 10 or 15 minutes at a time, with instructions to put as much pressure on the other team as possible.
To their credit, college coaches and players know that this system doesn't make sense. More than 90 percent surveyed in 2016 were in favor of moving to a full-year system, in which teams would play from September to early November, take a winter break, then restart the season in March. This would allow teams to play only one game every week, with only occasional midweek games — a much more sensible schedule, both on the field and in the classroom.
The NCAA, though, hasn't made any moves toward adopting this schedule or changing the rules to match up with soccer in the rest of the world. It's also certainly true that the NCAA doesn't need to put professional development at the forefront of its goals. The extra substitutions allow more players to play in each game, and the compressed schedule gives players a semester off from game pressure in the spring.