Two chapters of Audubon Minnesota, one of the state's leading conservation groups, have joined the opposition to paved bike-walking trails at Lebanon Hills Regional Park in Eagan and Apple Valley, adding weight to a passionate and growing public campaign to scale back the proposed development plan for the park.
Lebanon Hills, with its 1,842 acres of forests, grasslands, marshes and wetlands, is a prime example of the bird and wildlife habitats Audubon works to protect, said Lois Norrgard, representing the Minnesota River Valley chapter, based in Bloomington. "We lead many birding field trips in Lebanon Hills throughout the year and have many avid supporters and users of this park in our membership," Norrgard said.
"One of Audubon's members has identified 133 species of birds at Lebanon Hills. These sightings include rare species such as the Hooded Warbler, Kentucky Warbler, Summer Tanager and Yellow-breasted Chat," she said.
Norrgard's remarks, which were endorsed by the St. Paul Audubon Society, were made as part of the open public comment period on the proposed master plan for the park. It is under consideration now by Dakota County commissioners. It must be approved and forwarded to the Metropolitan Council if the park is to be eligible for state and regional park development funding.
The plan proposes paving a 6.5-mile trail through the park along with 1.5 miles of paved loops around two of the park lakes. The county parks staffers have said the paved trail would add popular activities — running, walking and biking — to the park year-round. The plan also calls for 24.5 miles of unpaved trails.
"We are concerned regarding the construction and unnecessary spending that has been proposed for Lebanon Hills with an unbalanced and expensive focus on developed trails and infrastructure," Norrgard said. "Adding and paving trails, buildings and parking lots increases forest fragmentation. Fragmentation is one of the leading causes of songbird habitat impact and songbird population decline."
Feb. 11 meeting
County commissioners are scheduled to discuss the plan again on Feb. 11 in their Physical Development Committee meeting. They will consider moving the proposed trail to a route along the perimeter of the park rather than through the park as originally proposed.
The county staff had routed the trail through parkland that had once been used for farms and pastures, but many members of the public objected to its going through the heart of the park.