
If two constant themes have emerged from the Timberwolves during Gersson Rosas' first year as President, they are these: 1) The Wolves intend to be patient with their top-down and then bottom-up makeover, eschewing shortcuts or Band-aids to solve problems; 2) Among the biggest goals in Year 1 is to implement a new system and style of play so that as the team acquires more talent to fit that system, the centerpieces already here will be well-versed in playing that way.
Both of these seem like reasonable ideas that are in harmony with each other, but I would offer one philosophical caveat:
Sometimes a short-term answer can be a critical step to solving a long-term question. Good is not always the enemy of great.
And it's within this idea that my biggest critique of this year's Wolves emerges. I don't think they went into the season with a good enough plan at point guard. And by failing to address that problem, even in the short term, they have proven vulnerable to this question: Can you adequately implement a system and evaluate how it's working when you don't have the point guard — or at least 48 minutes worth of them — to run it the way you want to?
The main issue, of course, was that their most experienced, expensive and credible option to start the year was Jeff Teague, who seemed an unlikely fit to play the way the Wolves wanted to play –"we need our lead guard to be a guy who pushes tempo, is more of a creator than a scorer," is how Rosas described it after Teague was finally traded.
But they spent half a year letting it play out, when it was obvious after a small fraction of those games and likely when zero games had been played.
The main appeal of Teague this year as an asset was his $19 million expiring contract, which the Wolves understandably didn't want to deal away for a more onerous contract with longer terms. But a deal like the one they finally made for Allen Crabbe's nearly identical contract seems like it could have been made at any time. Had it been sooner rather than later, maybe the Wolves could have started the year with two point guards of the Shabazz Napier type — inexpensive but established veterans who have a track record to prove their fit in this system.
Napier himself has been a worthy addition and a good move by Rosas; in 20 games as a starter, he's averaging 11.2 points, 6.2 assists and 3.9 rebounds with a dead even plus-minus — all while making less than $2 million in the last year of his contract.