A bill aimed at repealing Minneapolis and St. Paul's new paid sick leave ordinances — and preventing other Minnesota cities from passing their own labor rules — cleared a first hurdle in the Minnesota Legislature on Thursday.
The proposal, introduced by Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington, would prohibit cities from enacting ordinances that would mandate a higher minimum wage, paid sick leave or other types of leave or requirements about scheduling workers. After hours of public testimony, most of it in opposition to the bill, the House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance Committee approved the plan in a 13-9 party line vote.
Garofalo said his intent with the bill was to avoid a patchwork of regulations around the state.
"There are 854 cities in Minnesota," he said. "It is unrealistic and unproductive to have 854 labor laws across the state."
But a parade of speakers, including members of labor groups, clergy members, teachers, retail and fast food workers and others said the plan would hurt workers and take away cities' prerogative to make policies that make sense for their own residents.
It would be retroactive to any ordinance passed after Jan. 1, 2016, which means it would pre-empt sick leave measures passed by both of the state's largest cities last year. It could also block Minneapolis from passing a higher minimum wage, which officials have said is a goal for this year.
Katie Drahos, a retail worker and member of Neighborhoods Organizing for Change, took issue with supporters of the bill who said businesses already take care of their workers. She said she's never felt like she had power in workplaces run by large companies — but sees city government as a place she can lobby for her interests on how she is treated.
"House File 600 is a direct attack on the working class, and an attempt to make government even less accessible," she said.