A midlife name change is always a touchy proposition, even more so when the changer is a grande dame celebrating a centennial.
That's the status of the Minneapolis Institute of Art, which last week rechristened itself "Mia" (pronounced ME-ahh), trotted out a new logo and dropped the final "s" from the moniker by which it had been known since 1915: Minneapolis Institute of Arts.
Among local artniks and even the national press, the name change prompted some incredulity, eye-rolling and the inevitable Mamma Mia jokes. The typical reaction was, if a name ain't broke, why fix it?
Why? Because "branding" rules public images. Marketing theory holds that the right brand will clarify a message, boost popularity and increase market share. And a name is the heart of a great brand.
By coincidence, the museum's rebranding coincided with the opening of a smart little show, "beyondBrand," at Form + Content gallery in Minneapolis through Sept. 5. Together they illustrate the opportunities and pitfalls inherent in relying on branding to manipulate public opinion.
Minneapolis Institute of Art
When it opened in 1915, the gray limestone museum was intended as just the first phase of an ambitious neoclassical complex that was to include a symphony hall, an art school and other cultural amenities. It was dubbed the Minneapolis Institute of Arts to encompass all of that.
Times changed and none of the other buildings materialized. Children's Theatre and Minneapolis College of Art and Design now share the block, but are independent organizations. The much-expanded museum now dominates the site, offering everything from Old Master paintings and sculpture to photography and video, an Art Deco car, American Indian beadwork and contemporary pottery. Last year it attracted more than 750,000 visitors, a record.
Even so, the "s" befuddles people, said director Kaywin Feldman.