A friend who's been grappling with some personal depression for several years chuckled ruefully the other day telling a story about his therapist.
It seems the counselor couldn't be convinced that it was merely something as simple as a professional setback and the advance of elderhood that had triggered an emotional slump for "Joe." His adviser suspected that today's troubled political environment must be part of the problem.
By which he meant, of course, Donald Trump.
"I told him, 'No, I think it's that I lost a job and my life felt pointless,' " Joe said. But the psycho-political analyst persisted — even recommending that Joe seek companionship at a "resistance" rally with fellow sufferers of post-Trump stress disorder, or something.
Joe got a much-needed laugh out of this self-revealing advice, anyway. Evidently, the thought never occurred to examine a patient's politics before prescribing an anti-Trump primal scream cure.
Joe endures the exhaustion and bewildered uneasiness about the president that vast numbers of sensible Americans share. But he simply isn't the kind of advanced thinker who has come completely unglued where Trump is concerned. And that makes him a kind of American too few urban professional liberals seem ever to have met.
I thought of Joe's experience when I read Dan Balz's sprawling, fascinating travelogue through Trump country, published this month as a special report in the Washington Post. Chief political correspondent for the Post, Balz is an establishment aristocrat who has condescended to hear what the peasants have to say, touring what he's identified as the heartland of Trump's electoral revolution for 16 months following the insurgent's inauguration.
And one common sentiment Balz reports is expressed by a Midwesterner, significantly disillusioned with the president, who nonetheless "said he thought that news outlets, particularly cable television, had 'lost their minds about Trump.' "