
The dizzying pace of change in the modern world allows for multiple instances — daily? — that force us to question preexisting norms and wonder if our line of thinking still holds true.
This presents a formidable challenge to our brain circuitry, which has spent years perfecting shortcuts to answer seemingly routine questions in order to save the real power for the more complex ones.
Sports are particularly prone to this because certain things have been seemingly hard-wired into those of us of a particular minimum age for as long as we can remember.
Runner on second, nobody out: If nothing else, at least move the runner over. (Wait, that's not the plan any more?)
Going for it on 4th down is risky. (Hmm, turns out that punting in some cases is an even bigger risk and certainly a worse strategy. Who knew?)
As Amir Coffey contemplated his basketball future over the last couple months, eventually deciding Wednesday to stay committed to turning pro, I found myself falling into one of these old conventional wisdom traps. Basically, I couldn't imagine why Coffey would leave after his junior year.
Sure, he had a nice season and an especially strong finish, but wasn't the fact that Coffey did not get invited to the NBA combine a pretty good indicator that he was unlikely to be drafted (or would be a second-rounder at best)?
And wouldn't he have a much better chance of getting drafted — particularly in the first round, which comes with the instant millionaire status of a guaranteed multi-year contract — if he came back and had a great senior season?