Advertisement

Counterpoint: Bike lanes make things worse? No, for many, they make life better

Traffic-calming steps improve safety for the most vulnerable, and a lot of people favor them.

December 27, 2018 at 12:00AM
A bicyclist made her way down the bike lane during rush hour near Blaisdell Avenue and 26th Street, Friday, October 13, 2017 in Minneapolis, MN. New bike lanes are cropping up around the Twin Cities, creating a divide between cyclists who feel safer riding in a lane and motorists, residents and business owners frustrated by lost space for driving and parking. Many of the lanes have been added within the last five years, as a result of comprehensive bicycle master plans in both Minneapolis and St
A bike lane near Blaisdell Avenue and 26th Street in Minneapolis. (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

In these pages it has become fashionable to blame bike lanes for peak-hour traffic woes in Minneapolis ("The road less traveled," Dec. 9 and Readers Write, Dec. 11, Dec. 15). Seldom do these authors or letter writers concede that their own presence in a car on that particular street (multiplied by all of the other drivers) is what actually causes traffic jams.

Streets with protected bike lanes and other traffic-calming measures are "Complete Streets." For motorists, they flow freely most of the day (and often at peak hours as well). They often enhance the beauty of the neighborhood. They are safer for the most vulnerable users: cyclists and pedestrians. This isn't based on anecdotal evidence. The crash data show far fewer injuries and deaths after these improvements have been made.

Bike lanes and other traffic-calming measures have made life better for so many in our city, especially children. Put yourself in the shoes of a child who lives on a street that used to be four lanes of 40 mile-per-hour traffic, often right up to the curb. Designed exclusively to move peak-hour traffic, they were a nightmare for neighbors at any hour of day: cars speeding, swerving, honking, jockeying for position, striking and killing cyclists and pedestrians.

After traffic calming, neighbors enjoy more green space, a protected bike lane, a new crosswalk and certainly less stress and more peace of mind.

Some writers accuse Minneapolis of trying to "socially engineer" with these improvements. No, building safe streets isn't about forcing some change upon an unwilling populace. The people have already spoken. Driving culture has been in retreat for years. Vehicle miles driven have plummeted. Young people are famously opting out of car use. Complete Streets with protected bike lanes simply honor this change in our culture that has been germinating for years.

We now have bike-sharing, light rail, rapid bus lines and even those new scooters that appeared all over Minneapolis last summer. Noncar options have proliferated precisely because businesses and governments are responding to people's demand for choices. It follows that our streets should reflect this same spirit of choice, rather than serve, exclusively, the needs of rush hour traffic.

The future is brighter, and people's lives are better, because of Minneapolis' investment in Complete Streets.

Jeff "Nacho" Carlson lives in Minneapolis.

Advertisement
Advertisement
about the writer

about the writer

Jeff “Nacho” Carlson

More from Commentaries

card image

If most people on the planet were mindful most of the time, would we transform the human condition?

card image
card image
Advertisement

To leave a comment, .

Advertisement
Advertisement