Crown Bank faces a second clawback lawsuit related to its business with convicted Ponzi fraudster Tom Petters.
At issue this time: proceeds from Petters' former residence in Plymouth and from a luxury mountain home in Colorado.
Doug Kelley, the court-appointed lawyer working to recover money for investors and creditors, is seeking to get $2 million back from the Edina bank related to real estate pledges Petters made to the bank the day after federal authorities raided his home and offices in 2008.
The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, asserts that the day after the highly publicized raid, bank executive Kevin Howk went to the Petters corporate headquarters in Minnetonka to discuss the money Petters personally owed the bank. There, Petters granted Crown Bank an interest in two of his properties: a house in Plymouth and a home in Dillon, Colo.
Those transfers occurred after the bank was served a grand jury subpoena for all of its records regarding Petters and Petters Co. Inc. since 2002, according to the lawsuit. Accusing Crown Bank of one count of fraudulent transfer, Kelley contends that it didn't receive the property transfers in good faith and "was on notice" at the time that Petters and his companies were insolvent and implicated in a multibillion-dollar fraud.
A lawyer for Crown Bank said the bank hadn't been served yet, but called the complaint a repeat of the government's unsuccessful effort in Petters' criminal proceedings to get the bank to forfeit the two properties. The bank will seek immediate dismissal, said Christine Lindblad, a lawyer at Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly representing the bank.
"Crown Bank has spent significant time and money litigating its rights to these very same properties against the federal government and now the same properties are being pursued for the first time by the government's receiver under a meritless, nearly identical claim," Lindblad said, reading a prepared statement. "In the prior action against the federal government, the federal district court agreed with Crown Bank's position and affirmatively found that Crown Bank 'is a victim of Petters Ponzi scheme.'
"Now that Crown Bank won its case against the government, the receiver wants a second bite at the apple and wants to force this victim to incur additional legal fees," she said.