Delta Air Lines, facing mounting pressure from employees who said their uniforms are making them sick, will issue an entirely new garment line for its flight attendants and airport customer service agents by late next year.
The Atlanta-based airline promises the new line will be better than the current uniforms, which have been in use for less than two years. The Zac Posen-designed garments were celebrated upon launch in May 2018, but many flight attendants, gate and ticket agents said they quickly began experiencing adverse health effects from the apparel.
Delta, the dominant carrier at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, has faced withering public criticism, lawsuits and workers' compensation cases in recent months. Employees, who reported health issues ranging from hives to headaches to severe breathing problems, allege the company was not doing enough to help them find alternative uniforms that didn't make them sick.
As of November, about 3,000 flight attendants had formally reported adverse health effects attributed to the uniforms. That same month, the airline streamlined its uniform-complaint process, but it was too little too late for many flight attendants. A group of 536 workers, including dozens in Minnesota, filed a class-action lawsuit against Delta's uniform manufacturer, Lands' End of Dodgeville, Wis.
"In response to our employees, we've taken steps over the past few months to address feedback received about the uniform, including offering alternative garments, hiring fabric experts, and conducting comprehensive chemical testing," Ekrem Dimbiloglu, director of Delta's new uniform program, said in a statement. "This is a big decision, but we side with our people, and we are making a change."
Delta said it will enlist the help of its employees through the design and testing phase for the new uniforms, and will look for more sustainable textile practices as well as "taking greater control of the production process," the company announced Wednesday evening.
A single chemical has not been identified as the definitive culprit making the workers sick. Medical doctors and environmental toxicologists said the cause can be difficult to pinpoint given the wide variety of compounds, allergens and heavy metals found in modern textiles that often are added to elicit a desired attribute, such as antimicrobial, stain repellent or anti-wrinkle.
Once flight attendants started reporting health problems, Delta hired a third-party toxicology firm, Intertox, to test the uniforms. The airline published the findings, concluding that the garments were below the OEKO-TEX Standard 100, a key chemical standard, except for the in-flight apron, which tested high in a compound called PFOA. U.S. manufacturers like 3M and DuPont claim to have stopped making PFOA and PFAS, yet research shows their persistence in the environment. The union also points to the complexities of a global supply chain and the challenges of tracking every treatment applied to a garment.