On a corner just south of downtown Minneapolis, a new apartment complex called the Rose aims to set a standard for the way affordable rentals are built, with high-tech products and materials more often found in upscale homes.
The effort attracted the attention of the Parsons School of Design, which decided to partner in the project with a Minneapolis nonprofit organization and architect. Parsons professors hope to use pre- and post-construction data to inspire developers and manufacturers of home materials.
"This is a pioneering case study that will help us understand if this is replicable," Alison Mears, director of the healthy materials lab at Parsons, said during a visit to the Rose last week. "Our goal is to transform the affordable housing industry."
The 90-unit project is at the corner of Franklin and Portland avenues in a neighborhood where much of the housing is old and in disrepair and the bulk of the residents are renters.
Two years ago, the nonprofit group Aeon approached architect Paul Mellblom of Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, also known as MSR, with the idea of creating an affordable housing project using materials and design ideas that rarely make it into low-income housing because of cost or the fact that developers aren't aware of them.
Mellblom, a principal at MSR with a broad portfolio of housing and commercial buildings, adhered to efficiency standards set by the Living Futures Alliance to evaluate every decision in the design process.
Mellblom and the project's co-designer, Rhys MacPherson, designed the Rose to be 75 percent more energy efficient than code requirements. It'll have a solar thermal wall that produces hot water while also serving as an architectural feature, and the building was also designed to be ready to be retrofitted with solar photovoltaic panels — increasing the prospect that someday it might produce as much energy as its residents consume. There's also a sprawling community garden and most of the rainwater runoff will be captured and reused.
Overall, the "cost burden" of such decisions increased the cost of the building by about 22 percent over a conventional code-compliant apartment building.