The orange barrels are back. Minnesota's second season — road construction — has commenced, with 246 state road and bridge projects and delays, detours and driver frustration in the seven-month forecast. That's 44 fewer projects than in 2015 — not a worrisome decline, yet. But the long-range outlook is not good for a state whose economic vitality and quality of life is much dependent on safe and sufficient highways and transit.
"MnDOT is expected to experience a funding shortfall in 2018 … that will reduce ongoing state road and bridge funding by 45 percent," the Minnesota Department of Transportation advised last week. That precipitous shortfall would come at a most inopportune time in the infrastructure life cycle. "In the next 10 years, nearly 40 percent of our roads will be past their useful life," MnDOT's release said.
In addition, metro population growth and an aging population statewide are creating demand for transit that's outstripping available funds. And a deadline is near for a federally required 10 percent state contribution to a proposed extension of the Green Line from downtown Minneapolis to Eden Prairie.
In short: A state transportation funding boost can't wait. In the next five weeks, Gov. Mark Dayton and the 2016 Legislature are duty-bound to strike the best bargain they can to increase funding for roads, bridges and transit. The old saw about half a loaf applies in this situation. DFLers and Republicans should go as far as they can toward meeting needs pegged at $16.3 billion over the next 20 years.
To the extent they fall short, Minnesotans should insist that state lawmakers revisit the issue soon, perhaps as early as next year. Legislators have fallen into the bad habit of passing a major transportation bill once each generation. They might be better stewards of this crucial governmental service if they would aim for modest adjustments every few years.
Here's what we advise:
• Don't give up on a gas tax increase. The constitutionally dedicated per-gallon tax on motor fuels remains the workhorse of the state Trunk Highway Fund. At 28.5 cents per gallon, it's just below the 29.64-cent national average for state and local fuel taxes. That's not adequate in a cold-climate state that ranks fifth among 50 in paved road miles. Each additional penny added to the tax would raise $30 million per year.
• Tap the general fund — gently. Republican resistance to a gas tax increase runs deep. They prefer to divert a $300-million-per-year tax stream from the general fund to highways — a plan that House Speaker Kurt Daudt acknowledges would "starve out the general fund." That's "a really good thing," Daudt told a GOP audience last weekend.