A new federal report provides the strongest argument yet that e-cigarettes are simultaneously safer for adult smokers, but also gateway drugs that could turn teens to conventional cigarettes.
But that doesn't do much to sway Minnesotans such as Lee Kingston. The Cedar, Minn., dad already feels that e-cigarettes weaned him off traditional cigarettes — and he knows he doesn't want his three daughters to use them.
"I would not want them to do anything that could potentially cause them harm," said Kingston, although he considers e-cigarettes less harmful than other vices his children might one day face.
Tuesday's report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine was a summation of 800 studies of e-cigarettes, which are gaining popularity. An estimated 11 percent of U.S. high school students have in the past month used e-cigarettes — battery-operated heating elements that convert cartridges of liquids containing nicotine into inhaled vapor.
The report had something for everyone in the e-cigarette debate to love. And hate.
"E-cigarettes cannot be simply categorized as either beneficial or harmful," said David Eaton, a University of Washington academic who led the committee that wrote the report. "In some circumstances, such as their use by nonsmoking adolescents and young adults, their adverse effects clearly warrant concern. In other cases, such as when adult smokers use them to quit smoking, they offer an opportunity to reduce smoking-related illness."
Users of e-cigarettes celebrated the report's finding of their products as containing fewer cancer-causing materials than regular cigarettes.
Opposition "has been fueled by so much misinformation," said Craig Schutte, a 53-year-old limo driver who credits e-cigarettes for helping him quit tobacco. "I want to know the truth and I want everybody to know the truth. So I welcome this kind of scrutiny."