Members of the Minnesota House sparred Thursday over whether proposed federal environmental mandates would cost hundreds of jobs or spur a clean-energy revolution, with the fate of Minnesota's biggest power plant hanging in the balance.
The Sherco (Sherburne County) Generating Station, which includes three coal-burning towers in Becker, Minn., is also the state's largest emitter of carbon dioxide. Xcel Energy, which operates the plant, has come under pressure from environmentalists to close the two oldest units, which were built in the mid-1970s.
A new draft plan released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), dubbed the Clean Power Plan, requires a 40 percent reduction in Minnesota's emissions by 2030.
State Rep. Pat Garofalo, who leads the House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance Committee, planned a public hearing for Monday night in Becker to hear from those who might be most affected by changes at Sherco.
"We want renewable energy," Garofalo, R-Farmington, said at a news conference earlier in the day. "But let's recognize the fact that it ain't always windy, it ain't always sunny, and when [the] wind is not blowing and the sun isn't shining, I still want my heart monitor at the hospital to work for me."
DFLers say any coal-plant closings would be offset by new jobs in wind and solar energy.
But Garofalo and Rep. Jim Newberger, R-Becker, said the initiative would raise energy prices and kill jobs, particularly after the state has already spent billions to clean up the environment and reduce carbon-dioxide emissions by 20 percent over the past decade.
"Minnesota is being punished because we took this action without the federal government telling us," Garofalo said. "So whatever that percentage is — reasonable people can disagree about that — but why would we support a policy that punishes the state of Minnesota for acting on our own?"