The University of Minnesota won a dismissal Tuesday of a federal race and gender discrimination case filed by 10 Gophers football players during the investigation that followed a 2016 sexual assault allegation against them.
U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank said the players offered "no factual support for their allegations of disparate treatment" based on race, gender or their sport's reputation. He dismissed the suit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.
There were nine players initially in the lawsuit, but a 10th was added in recent months. The lawsuit identifies the players only as numbered John Does.
In a written statement, U officials said they welcomed the decision, "which confirms our belief that the claims brought in this case were without merit."
The lawsuit was filed in June 2018, some 20 months after a Jane Doe reported a sexual assault to the U's Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action (EOAA). A graphic investigative report was eventually leaked to the media.
She alleged that as many as a dozen football players had gang-raped her or watched and cheered as others did so at an off-campus party. In their defense, the players claimed the woman initiated sexual encounters with five Gophers and an underage recruit.
After interviews of Jane Doe and the alleged attackers, the EOAA in December 2016 found it "more likely than not" that 10 players had violated the U's student code of conduct.
No criminal charges were filed. But the players claimed the investigation was flawed at the outset because the U began "with a preconceived belief that male football players have a heightened propensity for assaulting women."