Dileep Rao financed the growth of more than 450 companies and real estate projects in more than two decades as a financier. In his newly published book "Nothing Ventured, Everything Gained," however, Rao sets out to demolish the "dominant myth" that building a giant company requires early stage venture capital.
The Twin Cities-based Rao, a clinical professor of entrepreneurship at Florida International University and formerly with the University of Minnesota, contends that entrepreneurs who avoid or delay getting venture capital can retain control of their company and more of the wealth it creates.
Rao, an entrepreneurial finance blogger for Forbes.com, bases his conclusion on interviews with hundred-million-dollar and billion-dollar entrepreneurs and analysis of the financial strategies of 85 of the latter.
Entrepreneurs, Rao argues, need sales and financial-management skills and innovation and takeoff strategies to develop companies without VC. Rao, whose book was published by Inc. magazine's imprint, cites examples ranging from Minnesotans such as Fastenal founder Bob Kierlin and Best Buy's Richard Schulze to "unicorn" entrepreneurs such as Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and Steve Jobs.
Q: What's your primary message in "Nothing Ventured, Everything Gained"?
A: You don't need venture capital until you take off. That's what these entrepreneurs showed. You may need it afterward but not necessarily. The point is when does the rest of the world see potential? I call that the "Aha." VC works after evidence of potential. For instance, Mark Zuckerberg started Facebook in his dorm. When he got, I think, millions of users a month, that's when the angels from Silicon Valley swooped in and carried him to heaven, which is also known as Palo Alto. (Venture capital came later, Rao's book notes.)
Q: So after 23 years as a financier, you are telling entrepreneurs they do not need venture capital?
A: When we financed ventures, about 20 to 25 percent were in venture capital and equity. The rest were in debt and leases. The first few years (mid- to late-1970s to early 1980s) were pretty good in that Minnesota was in the top three in venture capital. Then you could start to see the momentum shift to Silicon Valley. That's why we toned down the VC and increased the lending and real estate. We are somewhere around 46th or 47th in venture capital now. It's pathetic.