Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman's decision not to charge two police officers who shot and killed an unarmed black man in north Minneapolis last November was based on a wealth of video footage, witness and police statements and other forensic evidence, which Freeman says points to justifiable officer force after Jamar Clark attempted to take one of the officers' guns.
Freeman's office published relevant evidence to the county attorney's website — which the prosecutor hailed as an "unprecedented" level of transparency — including dozens of unedited videos, Clark's autopsy report and full interview transcripts. The witness statements are often contradictory and no single document or video tells the whole story, but the evidence dump provides many previously missing pieces that collectively help illuminate what happened that night.
After Freeman announced the no-charge decision and provided evidence highlights and some key video clips, activists interrupted the news conference and accused him of mischaracterizing the events, citing distrust with investigators.
"The system itself is broken," said Nekima Levy-Pounds, Minneapolis chapter president of the NAACP. "And as we say on the streets, the whole damn system is guilty as hell."
Clark's DNA found on gun
Freeman said the multiple agencies that investigated the shooting — the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA), FBI and Department of Justice — interviewed 110 witnesses, and the BCA lab reviewed 141 items from 21 lab reports, including DNA and blood spatter reports.
The BCA forensic analysis shows that DNA likely belonging to Clark was found on officer Mark Ringgenberg's SIG Sauer handgun grips. While the police say Clark grabbed the gun, the presence of DNA does not exclude the possibility that it got there by some other means. Clark's DNA was not found on other parts of the gun, including the trigger, slide and magazine bottom.
Freeman also provided evidence he said suggests Clark was not handcuffed at the time of the shooting — a claim that circulated afterward — such as photos of Clark's wrists taken at the hospital after the incident that don't appear to show cuff markings. In the autopsy report, the medical examiner said Clark's wrists had "no occult contusions, or other injuries suggestive of restraint." Investigators also couldn't find any of Clark's DNA on the inside of the cuffs, which prosecutors say is "strong evidence" he was not restrained.
Clashing statements
Witnesses offered conflicting versions of what happened.