By day, the 36-year-old Twin Cities man worked as a case manager at a community health clinic. Online, the FBI believes, he answered a call last year to work for a pro-ISIS propaganda group.
Probing the man's social media activity, agents found dozens of private messages allegedly exchanged with a suspected ISIS militant. This September, according to new court filings reviewed by the Star Tribune, the FBI stepped up its investigation and raided the man's apartment in Fridley.
But in a recent and unusual twist, his attorney has demanded that the government return a trove of property taken during the raid — including cellphones, computers and an iPad — and asked a judge to order the FBI to disclose the evidence and sources it cited to get a search warrant in the first place. The attorney, Jordan Kushner of Minneapolis, argues that the search was illegal.
The motion could set up a rare legal challenge to the FBI's series of ongoing terrorism investigations across Minnesota.
Kushner's motion argues that the FBI used the man's "exercise of his constitutionally protected First and Second Amendment" rights, rather than probable cause, to obtain the search warrant. "Further evidence would have been false," Kushner wrote.
Details of the case surfaced in court documents filed by Kushner on Monday — but then quickly sealed by a judge.
They suggest that the case could represent a fresh, and complicated, development in Minnesota's 15-year history of counterterrorism probes.
Anders Folk, a Minneapolis attorney and former federal prosecutor, said the time line of the investigation appears on par with the resource-intensive nature of terrorism cases, but added that allegations of helping with propaganda could represent a new chapter in counterterrorism investigations.