
Metro Transit's plan to dramatically improve local bus service by overhauling several inner-city routes is having trouble getting funding, despite its modest price tag compared to other transit projects.
The agency said Wednesday that plans to fast-track a rapid bus line along Penn Avenue in north Minneapolis next year were no longer possible due to funding complications. That moves the likely construction date back to 2017, if funding for the $35 million project can ultimately be secured.
The so-called arterial rapid bus concept -- new to the Twin Cities -- would alleviate delays that plague local bus routes through pre-boarding payment systems, fewer stops, multiple-door boarding and traffic signal priority. Stops would feature heated shelters and real-time arrival information.
The first such project, the A Line on Snelling Avenue, is expected to open either later this year or in early 2016, said Metro Transit's bus rapid transit manager Charles Carlson. The agency has stated that one line would open every year following the A Line, but three plans to build other lines in 2016 have now fallen through.
That's partly because unlike large regional light rail and highway bus rapid transit projects, the new inner-city rapid bus routes are not funded through the quarter-cent transit sales tax administered by five metro-area counties. That means every line requires cobbling together grants and bonding dollars to get off the ground.
"It really points to the need to find a path to fund these," Carlson said. He hopes that with the launch of the Snelling Line, "Having something you can ride and touch and feel will help inform the picture."
"Part of what we want to do with Snelling and the A Line is really show what these projects are," Carlson said. "Much like the way the Hiawatha project showed the regional what light rail could be."

The plan last year was to build the second line along West 7th Street in St. Paul, connecting downtown with the Mall of America and airport. But that was eliminated after St. Paul and Ramsey County expressed concerns about the line conflicting with other transit plans for the corridor.