Tony Webster wanted to know whether the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office was using newfangled technology to track people through their faces, fingerprints and irises.
So in August, Webster filed a public records request with the county seeking contracts, e-mail messages or any other data about mobile "biometric" technology.
So far, he hasn't uncovered any widespread deployment of Mission Impossible-style spy gadgets. What he has exposed is Hennepin County's sluggish observance of Minnesota's sunshine law.
In an April 22 order, Administrative Law Judge Jim Mortenson described four months of unexplained delays, improperly redacted records, inadequate answers and other behavior by county officials in response to Webster's request.
The county's actions violated the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), Mortenson found. He fined the county $300, the maximum allowed by law; ordered it to pay up to $5,000 in Webster's attorney's fees; refund $950 of the filing fee, and pay $1,000 in court costs.
Perhaps most significant, he ordered the county to figure out a way to make its millions of e-mail messages publicly accessible by June 1.
The county will appeal the decision and believes it has not violated the law, said Daniel Rogan, manager of the Hennepin County attorney's civil division.
"Responding to some of the requests took longer than we would have hoped," Rogan said Friday. But the larger issue, he said, is "we don't believe that the Data Practices Act requires government entities to do massive e-mail term searches the way that Mr. Webster requested it."