It seems like it's happening every week: a drug company executive is hauled before a hearing to answer for outrageous price increases. And eyes are on Washington again Wednesday morning, as makers of the cheaply produced and lifesaving EpiPen are set to appear before a congressional committee to explain the drug's 500 percent price increase in recent years.
Other examples are sadly plentiful. It's mostly why drug costs are now the fastest-growing driver of health-care costs, growing at a double-digit clip annually. Today, many drug companies act as unregulated monopolies, unwilling to self-regulate and immune to shaming from a justifiably outraged public.
We all agree that medications are an important social good, and that a healthily functioning pharmaceutical market is good for everyone. Drug companies should get fair payment so they can continue to thrive and innovate. Everyone should be able to benefit from what they provide, at a cost they can afford.
But none of this can happen if extortionate drug-price hikes continue unchecked.
So what can we do? First, we need to accept that everyone shares a role in working toward drug affordability. Health-care organizations like ours, for example, need to help patients and health-plan members get the most value from their medications, especially as drugs become more complex and specialized. Our pharmacists in particular can play a broader role as one-to-one medication navigators, helping patients to get the most from their drug therapies, find lower-cost options, and reduce waste.
But that can't and won't be enough. And although news coverage of drug company abuses often paints the public as powerless, we are not. There are many steps policymakers could take to put real and needed protection on the side of consumers now. Here are five:
1. Bring real drug costs and profits into the daylight. Cost transparency is a welcome trend in U.S. health care, but drug companies are getting a pass. We know little about what it costs to develop, produce and market drugs, or how drug companies profit from them. This cost information should be public, and lawmakers should compel it.
2. Make cost a factor in getting approval for drugs. Regulators now look at safety and effectiveness to determine the value of a drug to the community, ignoring cost. Drug cost should be evaluated as part of regulatory approval. This will require some exploration, and perhaps an expanded role for the Food and Drug Administration, but it could allow for needed limits — such as the maximum price a public or private payer would pay for a certain drug.