After a night shift at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Todd Ostlund would go home and switch off his phone ringer and anything else mimicking the many, many alarms a nurse hears while on duty.
And still, on many nights, he'd be roused from sleep by a "beep, beep, beep" in his dreams.
"I'm never having peace," he said.
Medical device alarms play critical roles in a hospital — to signal trouble with a patient's vital signs or medical equipment, and to draw caregivers to the bedside in time to help. But too often, alarms have been nuisances — set off by patient movements that cause their pulse to spike briefly, or by a momentary kink in an IV line, or patients simply scratching their noses and bumping the blood oxygen monitors on their fingers.
The resulting problem, known as "alarm fatigue," can prevent nurses from responding to real patient emergencies, with fatal results. The Joint Commission, the nation's hospital accrediting body, attributed 80 deaths and 13 serious injuries to alarm-related failures in a recent four-year period, and in 2013 required hospitals to commit to preventing alarm fatigue.
Now, a study from one of Abbott's intensive care units suggests that less, indeed, can be more.
The unit switched the default settings of its pulse-rate alarms from overly conservative thresholds of high and low beats per minute, and to avoid duplication with alarms that go off for related cardiac issues.
The number of pulse rate alarms dropped 76 percent within six months — but Abbott's nursing leaders found no resulting incidents of patient emergencies being missed. If anything, nurses responded even faster to the remaining alarms because they were less likely to be false.