Professor Erika Lee woke up the day after the presidential election with a brainstorm. With so much heated debate about immigration, the University of Minnesota historian decided a little historical perspective was desperately needed.
So she teamed up with experts across the country to launch a new website, #ImmigrationSyllabus, that offers a crash course in how immigration bans have played out in the past — often to the nation's lasting regret.
The goal, says Lee, is not to take sides in the political debate, but to let the facts do the talking.
"The issue of immigration is so divisive and many of the facts get lost," said Lee, director of the U's Immigration History Research Center. "As historians we know what the full impact was."
Since 1882 — when Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act — presidents and politicians have gone through cycles of banning or restricting various ethnic groups and nationalities, only to apologize years (or decades) later for the harm inflicted, Lee said. In 2012, for example, Congress formally expressed regret for the 19th-century law restricting Chinese immigration — nearly 70 years after it was repealed.
"When we close the gates, we look back on those periods with shame," she said. "And I do feel that we are on the verge of repeating some of those past mistakes."
The website made its debut on Jan. 26, which turned out to be especially timely.
The next day, President Trump signed an executive order temporarily banning refugees and visitors from seven Muslim countries — a move that triggered nationwide protests.