U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison and health-care lobbyist Howard Dean seem to be the front-runners for chair of the Democratic National Committee, in a field that is becoming more and more crowded. It is perhaps no surprise that Sen. Bernie Sanders is behind a run by Ellison.
Ellison was an early endorser of Sanders' candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination, and he made that endorsement in the face of the resistance of most of the Democratic establishment, including the DNC and its then-chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The DNC should not have played favorites during caucus and primary season. There is a lot of evidence that it did, including, of course, the WikiLeaks e-mail troves. It may have picked the wrong favorite, though.
There has been a lot of bellowing about the leaks as interference in the democratic (little "d") process, including by the editorial writers at the Star Tribune. But I cannot accept the idea that the truth (there has never been a legitimate claim that any of the e-mails were not genuine) is opposed to democracy.
It must also be said that the DNC's favoritism was the real interference with democracy.
All of the revelations — not just the WikiLeaks e-mails — brought Wasserman Schultz low, and caused a DNC vice chair, former Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, to issue an apology for the DNC's having not its thumb, but its entire posterior, on the scale. I have always wondered if his apology was really a DNC decision or just an announcement by somebody who thought it was a good idea. I suspect the latter.
There have been a lot of Democratic apologist voices in recent days saying, "Bernie wouldn't have done any better." There has been a lot of blaming of everybody, too: Sanders, the "Bernie bros," Jill Stein, James Comey, the media, sexists and racists, and the nefarious Donald Trump.
Everybody except the candidate that the Democrats ran. The one thing they could control.