Two of the state's most powerful nursing home lobbyists flanked Sen. Karin Housley, R-St. Mary's Point, last week at a Senate committee hearing as she made her case for a package of reforms intended to protect Minnesota seniors from abuse.
Every few minutes, one of the pair stepped to the microphone and launched into a monologue on the strain that each proposal might inflict on nursing homes. And as the hours wore on, the focus of the hearing gradually shifted from preventing elder abuse to the way that new regulation could cripple hundreds of senior care facilities across the state.
The scene exemplified the pervasive influence that Minnesota's nursing home industry exerts at the Legislature, where deep pockets and an army of lobbyists have given it a long-standing reputation for getting what it wants.
Yet that influence could face a pivotal test this year: Public alarm over a surge in maltreatment allegations and a scathing report by the state's Legislative Auditor have prompted wide-ranging proposals to expand government oversight of nearly 2,000 senior care facilities.
By last week, industry leaders had embraced much of a bill by Housley, who is chairwoman of the Senate Aging Committee, but they were pushing back against wider reforms, and their voice was being heard.
The senior care industry's two largest trade groups — Care Providers of Minnesota and LeadingAge Minnesota — spent nearly $1 million on lobbying in 2016 and 2017, an increase of 56 percent from the previous two years and the largest outlay by the groups on record, according to new data from the state Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board.
The groups, which together have nearly two dozen registered lobbyists, have also increased their presence at the Capitol, blitzing lawmakers with information as debate intensifies over how to fix the state's deeply flawed system for protecting seniors from maltreatment.
Industry leaders take a different view. Costly new regulations could hurt, not help, dozens of nursing homes that already struggle to recruit enough workers and pay them adequately, they argue.