As hundreds of protesters streamed into downtown Minneapolis on Tuesday night, a defiant show of disgust after a white man allegedly shot five black protesters outside the Fourth Precinct station, one of the demonstration's leaders reminded the crowd of the obvious: "The world is watching us."
The shooting by police of Jamar Clark, and the demonstrators, have indeed brought the state the kind of recognition that we don't want, the kind that visited Chicago last week and Ferguson, Mo., almost exactly a year before.
Until the protests that shut down the neighborhood, and at times parts of downtown, the rest of the world has known Minnesota as the place so frequently listed on those "best of" indexes and magazine stories.
Best place to live. Best place to raise a family. Most affordable cities.
What they likely learned over the past week, however, is that Minnesota is also a place where some white racists feel confident enough to come "locked and loaded" to a demonstration about race for "a little reverse cultural enriching."
The New York Times' John Eligon, who has written about the political impact of Black Lives Matter, had a Minneapolis dateline, as did the Washington Post's Wesley Lowery, a national reporter who covers justice, race and politics.
In short, the world was learning, perhaps for the first time, that progressive Minnesota is a great place to be white, but not such a great place to be black.
We've known it for a while, as local leaders have struggled with how to combat some of our state's more shocking statistics for black residents. The education achievement gap, for example, is considered one of the worst in America. The disparity between the median household incomes of white and black residents is drastic, and even though Minnesota has one of lowest unemployment rates in the nation, blacks are nearly four times more likely to be unemployed.