Minnesota's legislative auditor will review psychiatric research practices at the University of Minnesota following controversy over the death of a schizophrenic patient in a drug trial 10 years ago.
While he has declined to investigate the death in the past, Legislative Auditor James Nobles said Wednesday that he is launching a "preliminary review" of the U's conduct in psychiatric research overall and in the so-called CAFE drug trial in which Dan Markingson was enrolled when he died by suicide in May 2004.
Calls for independent investigations of the Markingson case have come in recent months from Minnesota lawmakers, former Gov. Arne Carlson, the Public Citizen advocacy group, and in a petition signed by some of the nation's foremost medical researchers and ethicists.
"The issue with them is that [university officials] haven't been as open as people expect them to be," Nobles said Wednesday.
Nobles sent a request to university President Eric Kaler Tuesday asking for copies of all reports of "adverse events" that have occurred in psychiatric research studies since January 2004.
Markingson's recruitment into the CAFE study, which was funded by drugmaker AstraZeneca to compare the effectiveness of three antipsychotic drugs, has fueled concerns even a decade after he died at age 26. Critics have accused Dr. Stephen Olson, the U psychiatrist who led the study, of having coercive power because he was recruiting Markingson into the drug trial at the same time that he was recommending to a court whether or not Markingson should be committed to a psychiatric hospital.
Olson has denied wrongdoing, and a 2005 review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration did not fault him or the university. But Minnesota lawmakers have since enacted a law that prevents a psychiatrist from recruiting his own patients into a research study when they are subject to commitment orders.
Olson's dual role had also been questioned by the state's mental health ombudsman in a report, but Markingson's death didn't become a public controversy until a 2008 newspaper report and subsequent articles and advocacy efforts by Carl Elliott, a U bioethics professor.