Anglers have a habitat of telling tales, and that's never truer than when they're talking about the size of their fish. Often, the fish that was THAT BIG turns out to have been only that big.
Perhaps that is simply the nature of angling, or anglers. No harm, no foul. Big fish, though, can be a big deal. That is part of the reason many anglers can tick off — within an ounce or two, anyway — the state record size of their favorite fish. Yet it's impossible to say how many people catch a state record fish only to realize later it may have been a record, or that they did something that disqualifies them.
Henry Drewes is the regional fisheries manager in Bemidji for the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). He used to run the program that keeps track of the state's record fish. He said he once had anglers bring in just the head of a flathead catfish they swore was larger than the 70-pound state record. He denied their request to certify it. More recently, a man caught what likely would have been a state record largemouth bass from a lake near Shakopee, but he'd already filleted it before realizing he might have had a record on his hands. Some anglers have questioned the veracity of some of the fish on the record list — the 3-pound, 4-ounce yellow perch caught in 1945, for example — but Drewes chalks that up to "our tendency to always question what came before us."
Mike Kurre is the DNR's mentoring program coordinator — and has Drewes' old job. Kurre was a busier man recently, wading through an unusual number of record applications — he had six on his desk — thanks in part to a new catch-and-release state record category that applies to flathead catfish, lake sturgeon and muskies. "Our plan is to maybe add a new fish species to that every year or every other year," Kurre said.
For now, though, the main record-keeping system is based on certified weight. With that in mind, here's a look at two fish species for which records are unlikely and two for which records are likely. Also highlighted are a couple of species anglers should consider targeting if they're looking to see their names in the record book.
Record unlikely Northern pike

Minnesota's northern pike record — a 45-pound, 12-ounce monster caught in 1929 in Lake County's Basswood Lake — is the state's longest-standing, and will likely stand the test of time. "I can't even imagine a fish like that," said Joe Mix, the DNR's assistant regional fisheries manager in Grand Rapids.
The number of large pike in Minnesota has declined precipitously since the 1940s or 1950s, Drewes said. These days, fishermen largely are satisfied if they can catch pike in the 3- to 5-pound range. Ten- to 15-pound fish are considered trophies in many lakes, and most anglers are all too familiar with pesky hammerhandle pike — those fish that generally are 22 inches or less in length and that overpopulate many lakes in the state.
"We see some 46-inchers on Upper Red Lake, and in the spring those are going to be 30-pound fish. But they're rare animals," Drewes said. "I won't say a new state record isn't out there somewhere, but it's less than a one-in-a-million shot."