Apart from football, soccer might be the sport that is the most obsessed with team formations.
Talk about formations — "tactics" — is the most popular form of soccer analysis. English soccer magazine FourFourTwo is named for perhaps the most well-known formation — four defenders, four midfielders, two strikers. But different formations fade in and out of vogue, depending on which teams are winning and what's popular.
The latest rage is the "back three" — playing with three dedicated defenders instead of four. It's a good bet that, trends being what they are, your favorite team will soon be deploying this formation.
The genesis of the three-defender look comes, paradoxically, from the organization of the attack. Against a traditional back four, a combination of three forwards — usually one center forward, and two attacking playmakers behind him — is particularly well set up to exploit the gaps in the back line. Adding a forward to the traditional two, though, means that there is one fewer player in the midfield and defense.
Many teams are finding that playing three central defenders and four midfielders is a more effective method of organization. It results in a group of five tight defenders in the center of the field, with two wingbacks who have fewer defensive responsibilities than they would as fullbacks in a back four.
Just this year in the Premier League, the 3-4-3 (or, sometimes, 3-4-2-1) has swept the nation. New Chelsea manager Antonio Conte has always favored playing three defenders, and after his new team was thumped 3-0 by Arsenal early in the year, Conte decided to make the leap. Chelsea promptly won 13 consecutive league matches, a span in which it allowed a miserly four goals.
At Arsenal, where manager Arsene Wenger's first act upon taking over in 1996 was to get in a fight with his team captain about whether the team should switch from a back three, the Gunners recently ended a two-decade run of playing with a back four. Wenger's team promptly defeated Middlesbrough and Manchester City with three defenders.
Of course, the 3-4-2-1 is not a cure-all. This is especially true if the other team switches to a 3-4-2-1 of its own, which cancels out many the benefits of the formation.