Civil rights attorneys suing the state of Minnesota for failing to educate poor and minority children called Thursday for a metro-wide integration plan and other remedies to address increasingly segregated schools.
But redrawing boundaries — one of the lawsuit's proposed solutions — is a "nonstarter," according to one state legislative leader.
Attorneys Daniel Shulman and his son John Shulman, filed the lawsuit in Hennepin County District Court on behalf of seven families and one community group, accusing the state of approving policies that have created schools with disproportionate numbers of poor and minority children. Students in those schools vastly underperform academically compared to children in integrated schools, the complaint states.
Twenty years ago, the Minneapolis NAACP sued the state on similar grounds, prompting a settlement that produced the "choice is yours" program that allows low-income students from Minneapolis to enroll in suburban districts.
"We are going to ensure that the Twin Cities become a national leader in educating children in the Twin Cities, and not as we are today, an absolute failure nationally — with one of the largest so-called learning gaps in the country," John Shulman said at a news conference Thursday. Shulman and his father also represented the NAACP in the older case.
Myron Orfield, a University of Minnesota law professor, said the "choice is yours" agreement showed that a legal remedy was possible. But, he added: "These are hard things. The more segregated you get, the harder it is to do something about it."
A recent Star Tribune analysis showed elementary students in Minneapolis and St. Paul attend schools that are more racially segregated than they have been in a generation. More than half the elementary schools in the two districts now have 80 percent or more minority students. In Minneapolis, a district that was fully integrated in the 1980s, two schools have student populations that are almost entirely white and 19 schools are more than 80 percent minority.
The two districts were not named as defendants in the lawsuit because, under law, the state bears the responsibility to provide an adequate education, Shulman said.