The newest addition to our list of things we never thought we'd think: Hey, Adrian Peterson — we liked you better when you were wearing a turban and riding a camel.
Peterson, long known for running angry, tweeted angrily on Thursday afternoon.
He complained about one-sided contracts, unguaranteed money, the power NFL teams hold over players' careers and the plight of his NFL brethren.
It was like hearing Derek Jeter whining about finding a date or Latrell Sprewell expounding on the importance of money management. Even if the message is apt, the messenger is not credible.
Peterson's Twitter rant was wrong even when he was theoretically right.
Yes, NFL contracts can be one-sided, meaning teams can sometimes cut a player and get out of paying him unguaranteed money.
But Peterson's isn't one-sided. He has been paid every dollar promised him. Last year, when he beat a child and was suspended for 15 games, he was paid for not playing, a seeming injustice the Vikings never complained about.
Even as Peterson has become an organizational headache, the Vikings have promised to fulfill their obligation by paying him in full this season.