Even as it continues to advance in the Legislature, a proposal to add a work requirement to Medicaid is meeting strong opposition from health care providers, counties and even some GOP legislators.
Supporters say that the Republican-sponsored bill is needed because Medicaid discourages "able-bodied" people from working, even at a time when the state is facing a workforce shortage.
"It will be one of the most cost-effective job bills that this Legislature has seen in years," said Sen. Mark Johnson, R-East Grand Forks, the lead author, who testified Thursday before a Senate health finance committee.
But critics say that the bill would cost the state and counties money, increase the size of government, overwhelm the state's workforce training programs, increase uncompensated health care costs in hospitals and clinics, and ultimately take away health care from people who need the treatment and stabilization that will help them get a job.
"You need health in order to work," said Sen. Tony Lourey, DFL-Kerrick. "Our investments in the health of Minnesotans pay tremendous dividends to our economy and our businesses in the state."
The Senate version of the bill advanced Thursday on a partisan vote, although Sen. Scott Jensen, R-Chaska, abstained from voting.
Jensen, a doctor, cited reports he heard from Hennepin County Medical Center, which estimated that 32,000 of its patients would be displaced. He also said the bill raises issues that need to be discussed. "But I don't think this bill should be a partisan issue," he said.
On Wednesday night, the House health finance committee narrowly approved the House version, with two Republicans voting no.