Once a week or so, Minneapolis resident Serafina Scheel hops aboard the Metro Transit A Line rapid bus when she feels like shopping in St. Paul.
The souped-up bus connects easily to the Green Line light rail, which has a stop near Scheel's home in Prospect Park. Its frequency — a bus every 10 minutes during peak hours — means she "doesn't have to worry whether the bus will show up," Scheel said. "It feels as reliable as the train."
Nearly three years after the $27 million A Line made its debut, Metro Transit has big plans to expand its rapid bus fleet — a strategy seen as both economical and politically palatable. It's also popular with riders at a time when local bus ridership is down in the Twin Cities and nationwide.
A second rapid bus called the C Line, which will include Metro Transit's first electric buses, is slated to begin passenger service later this year, serving north Minneapolis and the northern suburbs. And the Metropolitan Council will ask state lawmakers this session for funds to help build the $75 million D Line, which will largely replace the Route 5 local bus, the busiest transit thoroughfare in the state.
The council estimates it will take $400 million to $500 million from various sources to build out a system of 11 rapid bus lines.
In recent years, Republican lawmakers at the Capitol have looked askance at the regional planning body's funding requests for transit, particularly light rail. But arterial rapid buses seem to be a mode that both parties support, at least for now.
"In general, I think arterial buses are a better buy for the money, more bang for the buck," said Rep. Paul Torkelson, the Republican lead on the House Transportation Finance and Policy Division. Torkelson, a farmer from Hanska, said he took the A Line last summer to the State Fair and was impressed.
What is a rapid bus?
Part of the challenge for transit planners is explaining, particularly to legislators from greater Minnesota, just how this bus is different from all the others.