Emily Jensen, 28, and her husband, Dustin, 35, didn't choose marriage because it was a social expectation, the way many in their parents' generation did.
Before the St. Paul couple tied the knot last year, they'd already auditioned plenty of other prospective partners. "Both of us had been on lots of dates before we met each other, so we knew what we were looking for," Emily said.
They also came to marriage with high expectations for the various roles they would play in each other's lives. Not only would they be romantic partners, but also financial partners, travel partners and, eventually, co-parents.
The Jensens are also both pursuing careers while eschewing gender roles regarding familial responsibilities, which requires intensive communication. "When you take on a more egalitarian partnership model, everything's up for negotiation," Emily said.
Millennial marriages look quite different from those of their parents, the boomers. And, new research shows, they're more likely to last.
Young people's low divorce rates have caused the country's overall rate to decline about 8 percent in the past decade, according to a recent University of Maryland study. That's positive news, and the main reason behind it is a demographic shift: Millennials who get married are waiting until they're older and have earned college degrees, increasing their financial stability.
Millennials' selectivity about marriage partners and their willingness to communicate are also helping strengthen their nuptial bonds, but they can't take all the credit. They've come into adulthood in an era where gender roles have broken down and marriage's role in society has changed dramatically.
Another factor that's driving millennials' low divorce rates is that younger couples most at risk of splitting up — those with less education, which typically means less financial security — aren't getting married in the first place. They're cohabitating instead.