Minneapolis officials say they are confident the city's finances can absorb the $20 million payout to the family of police-shooting victim Justine Ruszczyk Damond, one of the largest settlements of its kind in the country.
However, the city will have to come up with a strategy to replenish the self-insurance fund where the settlement money is coming from — adding another justification for higher property taxes in the years ahead.
In an interview Thursday, Minneapolis Chief Financial Officer Mark Ruff said the city's actuaries believe additional massive payouts are unlikely in the near future.
"At least initially, conversations that I've had with our actuaries, they would treat this as an anomaly, a once-in-a-decade kind of occurrence," Ruff said. "They're not suggesting to us that we need to be concerned about it happening on a more rapid basis."
The scale of the payout to the Ruszczyk family, which was announced days after a former Minneapolis police officer was convicted of killing Damond, is influencing other pending litigation, however. Last week, the City Council rejected a payout to the family of Jamar Clark, who was shot dead by police in 2015, because they considered it too low, and now a family lawyer is demanding a "transformative" amount.
Ruff did not comment on the fiscal implications of the Clark lawsuit, saying it was pending litigation.
Minneapolis has been self-insured over the past two decades as a way to save the costs of paying outside insurance companies. Since 2018, the city has also covered its employees' health care.
Each city department pays a premium that goes into the self-insurance fund. The fund is then used to pay liability claims like the Damond settlement, attorney fees, accrued sick-leave benefits and workers' compensation claims.