Another 120 households in the east metro area are being advised to drink bottled water after Minnesota health officials drastically cut the exposure limits for a class of toxic chemicals that has long contaminated drinking water there.
Minnesota regulators concluded after months of review that the current federal standards are insufficient to protect infants and small children from the chemicals' health risks.
The state's updated limits — half the level recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — reflect the latest scientific findings on the exposure and health effects of the two chemicals, known as PFOA and PFOS. They are among a class of chemicals called PFCs that were made for decades at a 3M Co. manufacturing site in Cottage Grove and were among the most widely used in the world.
Decades of research has shown that exposure to PFCs in drinking water has been linked to certain cancers, liver and thyroid ailments, and developmental problems in infants. Since the 2002 discovery that they had contaminated groundwater from the 3M plant and dump sites in Washington County, east metro cities and hundreds of homeowners have had to add filtration and treatment systems to protect their drinking water.
Water with PFOA or PFOS, even at levels above the new recommended limits, does not represent an immediate health threat, state officials noted. Concentrations in the groundwater also have not changed, they said. But scientists' understanding of their potential health impacts has grown.
The much lower limits are designed to reduce long-term risks for fetuses, breast-fed infants and young children. That makes them overprotective for most people, health officials said Tuesday, and women who are breast feeding infants should continue to do so because the health benefits outweigh the risks, they said.
"We err on the side of caution to protect the most vulnerable as best we can," said Dr. Ed Ehlinger, Minnesota health commissioner.
Dr. Carol Ley, 3M's vice president and corporate medical director, said in a statement, "We believe the advisory levels announced by MDH are overly conservative. We believe that PFOS and PFOA do not present health risks at levels they are typically found in the environment or in human blood."