The more I learned about what really happened near St. Peter at the Minnesota River ford known as Traverse des Sioux, the harder it became at news conferences in the Governor's Reception Room to look up at the painting behind the podium.
The painting, "Treaty of Traverse des Sioux," is artist Francis David Millet's rendering of the moment in 1851 at which desperate Dakota people were coerced into yielding control of 24 million acres — most of today's southwestern Minnesota — at the pittance of 7.5 cents per acre. Millet portrays Minnesota Territory's leading politicians, Henry Sibley and Alexander Ramsey, presiding over a placid scene of native and white people transacting a business deal.
During that same ceremony, Dakota leaders were tricked into signing a separate "traders' paper" that cheated them out of a goodly portion of the annual federal annuity payment the treaty promised. A delayed payment of that depleted annuity in 1862 sparked the bloody uprising known as the U.S.-Dakota War. The painting puts a glorified gloss on the moment when that war's seed was planted.
I'd argue that what Sibley and Ramsey did to the Dakota that day and in the years that followed is not fitting company for the good governors who've stood beneath that painting from 1905, when the Capitol opened, until 2014, when Gov. Mark Dayton decamped for the Veterans' Services Building so that major renovations could proceed.
Will that painting remain in a conspicuous spot when the Capitol reopens in 2017?
What about the other outrage in the same room? That would be the portrayal of Father Louis Hennepin "christening" the Falls of St. Anthony as the Dakota men who brought him there lounge about and a bare-breasted Dakota woman carries the visiting priest's pack.
Are Minnesotans capable of the same re-examination of their Capitol's art that South Carolinians have directed lately at the Confederate flag that hangs outside theirs?
Former Minnesota Supreme Court Associate Justice Paul Anderson rephrased those questions: "In accurately and respectfully representing all of Minnesota's people, can we do a lot better? The answer is yes."