Minnesota Supreme Court Justice David Stras faced a Senate committee Wednesday, promising an independent approach if he's confirmed for the federal judiciary but declining to outline his views on a number of hot-button issues.
Stras, flanked by his family and supporters from Minnesota legal and political circles, told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he would be an impartial voice on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The nomination by President Donald Trump had stalled until Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican committee chairman, scheduled this week's hearing, over the objections of one of Stras' home-state senators, Al Franken.
"I am deeply humbled by this opportunity," said Stras, a grandson of Holocaust survivors who rose to serve on Minnesota's highest court. "If confirmed, I will remain committed to interpreting and applying the law in an impartial manner, as I have done for the past seven years as a justice on the Minnesota Supreme Court."
Stras' qualifications for the job had been overshadowed by the process that put his name into consideration. Minnesota's Democratic senators complained that the Trump administration sidestepped the usual consultation process and simply presented them with Stras' name, culled from a list of potential Supreme Court nominees provided by legal groups that espouse a conservative judicial philosophy.
"I want everybody, you especially, to understand that my objection here was not about you personally," Franken said to Stras during the hearing. Franken had refused to return the so-called blue slip required for judicial nominees to advance to a hearing, but Grassley announced two weeks ago that he would schedule the hearing anyway — on the same day Franken was hit by a sexual harassment allegation.
Franken quoted then-candidate Trump's remarks about judicial nominations during the campaign, saying he "proudly declared he would, 'appoint judges very much in the mold of Justice [Antonin] Scalia' and said 'the justices I'm going to appoint will be pro-life. They will have a conservative bent.' "
Franken also said that it "concerns me that the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation seem to have more insight — must have more insight — into your views and philosophy than the American people do."
Stras declined to discuss his views on issues like affirmative action or abortion, but said he would rule impartially from the bench.