A tour of Ultra Machining Co. last year sold Bonnie Doucette on becoming a machinist.
"The industry seems to be OK, and UMC is a good place to work," said Doucette, an 18-year-old freshman at St. Cloud Technical & Community College.
The state has smoothed her career path with a $6,000-a year-scholarship through a program that directs people to manufacturing jobs. Meanwhile, Doucette credits apprenticeships at Wright Technical Center and Ultra Machining with helping her in coursework.
"It gave me a leg up," she said.
The personal touch and public-private partnership that are giving Doucette a shot at a skilled production position represent the kind of cooperation experts say Minnesota must have to fill manufacturing jobs.
Federal programs that pump money into science, technology, engineering and math — known as STEM education — do not guarantee a solid return on investment, said University of Illinois workforce expert Andrew Weaver.
Skill mismatches alone explain just 14 percent of manufacturers' hiring difficulties, according to a 2013 survey by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). Most of the time it's a mixture of missing skills, turnover in sought-after jobs such as machining and "declining interest in skilled production as a career track."
Manufacturing companies absolutely need applicants with improved math and reading skills, Weaver's research shows. But just as much, the current manufacturing climate demands "ongoing and constant feedback and communications" between individual employers and educators, Weaver said.