Several Twin Cities nonprofits that serve immigrants are raising concerns about a federal plan to add between 200 and 600 detention beds in Minnesota and nearby states.
The nonprofits, which offer free legal services, wrote to Immigration and Customs Enforcement this week arguing that a further ramping up of immigration detention in the region would imperil due process for immigrants, in part because free service providers are already swamped with cases. ICE posted a notice inquiring about the availability of extra beds for its St. Paul, Chicago, Detroit and Salt Lake City offices.
A recent Star Tribune analysis showed a marked increase in immigration detentions at five Minnesota county jails that contract with ICE, leading some of them to send local inmates to other counties or increase the number of inmates jailed two to a cell. Immigration arrests out of ICE's St. Paul office, which also covers the Dakotas, Nebraska and Iowa, were up 78 percent through June of this year compared with the same period in 2016, based on ICE data.
"The government has an obligation to ensure that every human being here has access to due process of law," said Michele McKenzie at the nonprofit Advocates for Human Rights.
ICE said it does not comment on the contracting process. But the agency noted "a plethora" of immigration attorneys in the area, including a lengthy list of pro bono and low-cost options the local immigration court provides. It rejected the claim that adding detention beds would hamper access to representation.
U.S. law does not grant a right to an attorney in immigration court.
In February, the Trump administration expanded its deportation priorities, and top officials have said anyone in the United States illegally is fair game for removal. Authorities continue to target primarily those with criminal convictions and final deportation orders, but they have also detained a growing number of people they encounter along the way.
In the administration's harder line on bond and detention, some supporters have seen a welcome departure from what they call "catch and release," the practice of freeing immigrants while their cases drag on for years in backlogged immigration courts.