WASHINGTON – The White House victory in a power struggle to control the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency that is supposed to keep average citizens from being exploited by banks, credit card companies and other lenders, will resonate in every state in the union.
Depending on which advocates you believe, President Donald Trump's appointment of Mick Mulvaney as interim director of the bureau could mean that Minnesotans can look forward to indifference about consumer complaints from an industry-friendly director who once referred to CFPB as a bad joke. Or it could mean that Minnesotans will work with a fairer, more efficient agency that no longer writes its own rules and applies a broad-brush, business-bashing approach to every financial institution.
"CFPB has developed a very effective consumer response system," said Prentiss Cox, who teaches consumer law at the University of Minnesota. "Companies know failure to respond could result in CFPB looking deeper at what's happening at the company … But political opposition has been unrelenting since the day [the bureau] was born."
The CFPB was created with enormous independence from political interference to give it leverage against one of the most powerful lobbies in the nation — the financial services industry. The bureau's budget is guaranteed through the Federal Reserve, outside of usual Congressional funding.
But critics believe the arrangement is not working well. Republicans in Congress have offered dozens of bills to change CFPB governance and funding with an eye toward more control of an entity they say answers to no one.
Joe Witt, CEO of the Minnesota Bankers Association, said CFPB needs to tailor regulations to fit different-size banks. For instance, what's needed in New York City may not be needed in Thief River Falls, Minn. The bureau should punish bad actors without punishing banks that did nothing wrong as it did in placing costly privacy regulations on all banks after a tiny percentage sold customer data, Witt said. Overall, he added, CFPB needs to show exactly how consumers benefit from its actions.
"The Obama administration did none of that," Witt said. "We are hopeful that the new administration will regulate banks in a more effective way."
Outgoing director Richard Cordray was free to act without Congressional approval on many matters. He did, writing and implementing rules that since July 2011 have, according to a CFPB spokesman, delivered roughly $3.9 billion in money returned to consumers, $7.9 billion in "principal reductions, canceled debts, and other consumer relief" and $473 million in "consumer relief as a result of supervisory activity." An additional $600 million has gone into the bureau's civil penalty fund.