Minnesota's strong economy and an anticipated savings in health care costs are expected to leave the state with a $1.5 billion budget surplus for the next two years, a dramatic increase from a projection earlier this year.
The nation is in the second-longest period of sustained growth in history, behind a stretch in the 1990s, and it's left the state with a string of back-to-back budget surpluses.
Budget numbers released Thursday "show a remarkable recovery from the financial shambles in which I took office eight years ago," said outgoing Gov. Mark Dayton, who came into office facing a $6.2 billion deficit, drained reserves and late payments to public schools. Incoming Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, will take over in January in a strong position to start working on some of his campaign vows, including boosting educational spending, expanding publicly funded health care and new money for transportation. Republican leaders, meanwhile, are already pushing for tax cuts.
The state's economist and budget officials release forecasts twice a year, looking at state, national and even global economic trends. This new projection is $1.2 billion higher than the forecast in February.
Minnesota Management and Budget officials attributed the jump to increased income and business tax collections and lower spending, particularly on health care. But they cautioned that slower growth is on the horizon.
While the state's short-term financial outlook is strong, the sustained economic expansion is projected to slow in 2022 and 2023. Budget officials estimate that if left alone, the surplus will drop to $456 million in those years.
State Economist Laura Kalambokidis said there are a number of factors that could change those projections. The recent wave of tariffs and new uncertainty about U.S. trade policies with China could cause businesses to become uneasy and hamper economic growth, she said. Minnesota exports grew to $23 billion, up 8 percent in 2017, placing Minnesota 23rd among states ranked by export value.
The stock market gains of earlier this year were disrupted by recent volatility, Kalambokidis noted, and it is still not clear how Minnesotans are responding to the latest round of federal tax changes.