The Minnesota Vikings want to stop Wells Fargo from putting up mounted, illuminated signs on the rooftops of two new Minneapolis office towers because they violate an agreement and threaten to "photobomb" the image of the U.S. Bank Stadium in Downtown East, according to a Hennepin County District Court lawsuit.
Vikings vice president Lester Bagley said Wednesday that Wells Fargo's steps to install the signs violate a February 2014 agreement between the bank and the team, referred to in the lawsuit as Minnesota Vikings Football Stadium LLC (StadCo).
The dispute is also a multimillion-dollar battle of bank branding. U.S. Bank has paid undisclosed millions to the Vikings to inscribe its name on the new stadium for the next two decades, including a massive logo across the roof visible from passing airplanes.
In a statement Wednesday, Wells Fargo spokesman John Hobot said, "We are satisfied with the signage package that was approved for our $300 million community investment initiative for our new campus in the historic Downtown East neighborhood."
For more than two years, the subject of signage on the two 17-story Wells Fargo towers adjacent to the stadium has been intensely negotiated, mostly in private. The history and legal rights behind the size of the signs involve a tangle of Minneapolis zoning ordinances, site plans and interests including those of developer Ryan Cos., the banks, the Vikings and the Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority.
"StadCo has worked diligently to create and promote the development of an iconic, bold new stadium (now known as U.S. Bank Stadium) and related infrastructure in the Downtown East area of Minneapolis," the lawsuit said, adding that the efforts included agreements with neighbors to "control and protect" the stadium's image "since it will be an important landmark in the state for years to come."
The Vikings and Wells Fargo agreed that the only rooftop signs on the two towers would be "non-mounted" and not illuminated, the lawsuit said.
"Agreeing to any rooftop signs was a major concession by StadCo, given that it had the ability to prohibit any and all rooftop and other exterior signage on the Wells Fargo towers," the lawsuit said.